Skip to content
The Dynamic Therapist

The blog · Simon Taylor

When to Leave and When to Stay: Making the Decision Clearly

The decision to leave a toxic relationship or stay and manage it is one of the most significant decisions a person can make.
Here is a values-based framework for making it clearly — without guilt, pressure or the false hope that things will change on their own.

When to Leave and When to Stay: Making the Decision Clearly

19 October 2026 · 5 min read

The Decision That Keeps Not Getting Made

The decision to leave a relationship or workplace that is damaging you is one that many people approach repeatedly without arriving at. They know, in some part of themselves, that something needs to change. They cannot quite commit to the change. And so the situation persists — sometimes for years — while the decision circles without landing.

This is not weakness. It is the predictable result of a genuinely difficult decision involving significant competing considerations: love, history, financial dependency, children, professional consequences, the genuine uncertainty of what leaving looks like in practice, and the hope — sustained by the good periods — that things might change.

A framework does not make this decision for you. What it does is provide a clearer structure for thinking it through — one that cuts through the loop rather than adding another circuit to it.

The Questions That Actually Matter

Has the core pattern changed?

Not have things been better recently. Has the underlying pattern — the behaviour, the dynamic, the fundamental way the relationship works — actually changed in any sustained way? This distinction is important because good periods are a feature of damaging relationships, not evidence that the pattern has resolved. The relevant question is not 'are things okay right now?' but 'is this relationship fundamentally different from what it was six months or a year ago?'

What would need to be true for this to be a good relationship?

Name it specifically. Not 'things would need to be better.' What specific things would need to change, and stay changed, for this to be a relationship you are genuinely glad to be in? Now ask: is there evidence that those things are changing? Is the other person engaging with those changes actively? Or are you in a position of indefinite hope?

What is the cost of staying?

Name this honestly and specifically. Not in general emotional terms but in concrete ones. Your Self-Esteem. Your self-trust. Your health. Your relationships with other people. Your sense of yourself. The person you were before this relationship began. What is it costing you to be here? And what will it have cost you in five years if the pattern does not change?

What is the cost of leaving?

Name this honestly too. Financial. Practical. Relational. The Grief of the relationship ending. The disruption of circumstances. The uncertainty of what comes next. These are real costs. They deserve honest acknowledgement — not as reasons to stay indefinitely, but as things that need to be planned for.

What is the cost of continuing to not decide?

This is consistently the most underweighted question. Indecision has a cost. The sustained limbo of knowing something needs to change but not changing it produces its own erosion — of energy, of hope, of the sense that you have agency in your own life. The cost of not deciding is real and tends to compound.

The Hope Trap

One of the most powerful obstacles to clear decision-making in these situations is hope: the belief that if things could just return to how they were in the best periods, the relationship would be what you want it to be. This hope is maintained by the good periods, which are real. The problem is that the good periods are not evidence of what the relationship would be without the damaging dynamic. They are evidence of what the damaging dynamic looks like when it is not actively in its harmful phase.

Hope is not wrong. But hope directed at a specific, time-limited, conditional version of the other person changing is not the same as hope grounded in specific, observable, sustained evidence of change. Honest examination of which kind of hope you are operating on is important.

Three Reflection Questions

  1. If you imagine yourself five years from now, having stayed and nothing having fundamentally changed — how do you feel? And if you imagine yourself five years from now, having left — how do you feel?
  2. Is the hope you are holding grounded in specific evidence of change, or in the possibility of change?
  3. What decision would you encourage a close friend to make if they described your situation to you?

Key Takeaways

  • The decision to stay or leave is genuinely difficult and involves competing real costs.
  • The relevant question is not whether things are better right now but whether the core pattern has fundamentally changed.
  • The cost of not deciding is real and compounds — it deserves to be weighed alongside the costs of staying or leaving.
  • Hope grounded in possibility is different from hope grounded in specific, observable evidence of change.
  • A framework does not make the decision. It creates conditions in which making it is more honest.

Frequently Asked Questions

What if I keep going round in the same loop?

Then something is preventing you from landing on the decision, and that something is worth examining directly. The loop is often a sign that the question being asked is not quite the right one — or that there is a specific fear about one of the outcomes that is not being fully acknowledged.

Does leaving mean the relationship was a failure?

No. Ending a relationship that is damaging you is not a failure. It is an accurate assessment of a situation and an appropriate response to it.

What if I am not sure whether to stay or go but I know I need support?

That is exactly the situation a consultation is designed for — not to be told what to decide, but to think through the decision more clearly with someone who can ask the right questions.

What about children?

Children are a significant and genuinely complicating factor. The research on children and high-conflict separation versus children in high-conflict intact households is complex and contextual. This is worth discussing with a professional who can help you think through the specific circumstances.

What if I have already decided and am looking for permission?

You do not need permission. If you have already decided, the remaining question is how to act on the decision — and that is a separate and very practical question worth addressing directly.


The Decision Belongs to You

Not to the person making you doubt yourself. Not to the people in your life who have opinions about what you should do. Not to the hope of what the relationship could have been.

To you. Made clearly, honestly and in your own genuine interest.

Simon Taylor supports people working through the decision to stay or leave — helping them think it through clearly rather than in circles. A free 30-minute consultation is a good place to have that conversation.

Book Your Free 30-Minute Consultation | Get The Little Book of Big Changes

← Back to the blog

Read next

Let's have a proper conversation.

My diary is full at the moment, so free consultations are running as a waiting list for my next intake of clients. Tell me what's going on and I'll be in touch personally as soon as a space opens.